- Yesterday I had a long conversation with a program manager in an oil and gas company who is trained as an engineer, yet is routined called upon to mediate and facilitate multi-stakeholder meetings who have a multiplicity of interests and needs. He was exploring whether our upcoming program, Facilitating Wise Action: Engaging Groups in Meaningful Conversations Around Complex Issues, might provide him with useful tools. He asked me, "How do you turn these meetings where everyone is focused on their own WIIFM (what's in it for me?) into a more productive conversation where we can also talk about what we have in common. For example, sometimes we should be asking, what are we all going to do together to leave something behind in situations where we all realize we can't continue to do what we've all been doing? How do we get business, government and NGO's to be willing to innovate, risk and do something different together?"
- Two weeks ago, I spent a morning with some 40 members of a parks consultation community of practice interested in learning how Appreciative Inquiry might be an appropriate engagement method for their various stakeholder meetings.
- A few months ago, a colleague in a large resource company commented to me that the time their senior Executive Team devotes to stakeholder issues now often overshadows all other priorities, which is in stark contrast to the way things were a few years ago. He attributed this to the much smaller world we live in, the rise of stakeholder awareness, sophistication and activism, and the increasing expectation by people generally to be consulted and involved on issues that affect them, not only by their governments, but also by businesses and social profit agencies. We were exploring how their company might develop a more effective strategy for building long-term, trust-based stakeholder relationships.
In all of these cases, a key part of my message has been the importance of knowing one's broad purpose for engaging stakeholders, and then adopting the appropriate method to support it. As illustrated in the above table, if the starting purpose is to provide information, tell your story, obtain input and undertake some type of market research (all one-way or to some extent transactional forms of engagement), then certain methods are appropriate. If the reason for engaging is to build awareness and trust, learn together, build common ground, resolve conflict, collaborate and work together over time, then other methods will be more effective.

1 comments:
Hi,
Companies do seem to be taking stakeholder engagement more and more seriously. The importance is definitely to show the value that comes out of their time and financial investment.
I was wondering if you might be interested in conducting a video interview with my team. We work on environmental regulations in Canada and more and more regualtions are pushing companies to consult.
You can see an example of an interview with a stakeholder engagement consultant here: http://www.nimonik.ca/2009/12/christian-matossian-on-stakeholder-engagement/
We would do this over Skype and promote it on our blog, twitter and main site.
If this interests you, please let me know and I can send you more details by email.
Warm Regards,
Jonathan
Post a Comment